For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a good friend - my extremely own "best-selling" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.
Yet it was entirely composed by AI, archmageriseswiki.com with a few easy triggers about me provided by my good friend Janet.
It's an interesting read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It mimics my chatty style of writing, koha-community.cz however it's likewise a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's triggers in collecting data about me.
Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.
There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.
There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had offered around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, because pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language model.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any additional copies.
There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anybody's name, including celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and pleasure".
Legally, surgiteams.com the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.
He wishes to expand his range, creating different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.
It's likewise a bit terrifying if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.
Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.
"We should be clear, when we are discussing information here, we in fact imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.
"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."
In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.
"I do not think the use of generative AI for imaginative purposes should be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective however let's construct it morally and relatively."
OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and dents America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.
The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize creators' material on the internet to help develop their designs, genbecle.com unless the rights holders opt out.
Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".
He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, links.gtanet.com.br is likewise strongly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.
"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The government is weakening among its best performing industries on the vague pledge of growth."
A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them certify their material, access to top quality product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for ideal holders from AI developers."
Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national data library containing public data from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.
In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the security of AI with, amongst other things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.
But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is stated to desire the AI sector to face less policy.
This comes as a variety of suits against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, clashofcryptos.trade music labels, and even a comedian.
They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their approval, and used it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it need to be spending for it.
If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.
As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has lots of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite difficult to read in parts since it's so long-winded.
But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure how long I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.
Outside the UK? Sign up here.
